From 51fc4c61281d60183d38ee4a5e8fb06ad98d5202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sandra Shaw Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 21:25:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add 'State Division Tweets Picture Selling Sharia Law' --- State-Division-Tweets-Picture-Selling-Sharia-Law.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) create mode 100644 State-Division-Tweets-Picture-Selling-Sharia-Law.md diff --git a/State-Division-Tweets-Picture-Selling-Sharia-Law.md b/State-Division-Tweets-Picture-Selling-Sharia-Law.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ef9734 --- /dev/null +++ b/State-Division-Tweets-Picture-Selling-Sharia-Law.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +[patronite.pl](https://patronite.pl/peekr)Kagan: But I feel that the question about whether it is a dumb law is completely different from the query of whether or not the question of it's , and uh, and uh, I believe the courts would be incorrect to strike down legal guidelines that they suppose are, er, uh, mindless, simply because they're senseless. The rule of regulation might be one among our biggest exports. + +The SRA introduced the matter before the SDT and the SDT discovered that the solicitor had no preliminary cause to question E's skills as an skilled witness \ No newline at end of file